Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 6:05:08 GMT -5
Agross remuneration both social contributions the advance granted in April the amount granted by the provisional judicial administrator as prefinancing as well as an amount fictitiously withheld from the salary tax provided for by German law . In the appeal filed against the decision Mr. Eschenbrenner claimed that the withholding of the fictitious tax on wages violated Union law as he was not subject to the tax in Germany. By the decision of September the defendant rejected the appeal as the compensation was correctly calculated according to the provisions in force in Germany.
On October Mr. Eschenbrenner filed an appeal with the Sozialgericht Country Email List Social Court. allowance was not in accordance with Article TFEU as it adversely affected his status as a frontier worker . According to Mr Eschenbrenner the German workers receive an insolvency allowance which represents of their previous net income whereas he as a frontier worker normally subject to taxation in France received an amount considerably less than his income net before as the payroll tax applicable in.
Germany is fictitiously taken into account which is significantly higher than that applicable in France. The Sozialgericht Social Court dismissed the action by judgment of October . On December Mr. Eschenbrenner appealed against this judgment to the referring court. The referring court considers that the amount of the insolvency allowance should in principle be equal to the net remuneration . Or in applying the method of calculation provided for in Article paragraph point of SGB III this allowance on the contrary would not allow the compensation by the frontier workers of their previous net remuneration. The referring.
On October Mr. Eschenbrenner filed an appeal with the Sozialgericht Country Email List Social Court. allowance was not in accordance with Article TFEU as it adversely affected his status as a frontier worker . According to Mr Eschenbrenner the German workers receive an insolvency allowance which represents of their previous net income whereas he as a frontier worker normally subject to taxation in France received an amount considerably less than his income net before as the payroll tax applicable in.
Germany is fictitiously taken into account which is significantly higher than that applicable in France. The Sozialgericht Social Court dismissed the action by judgment of October . On December Mr. Eschenbrenner appealed against this judgment to the referring court. The referring court considers that the amount of the insolvency allowance should in principle be equal to the net remuneration . Or in applying the method of calculation provided for in Article paragraph point of SGB III this allowance on the contrary would not allow the compensation by the frontier workers of their previous net remuneration. The referring.